Don't say you weren't consulted ...

Nov. 2010

The EU is proposing to harden laws and enforce even stronger measures against tobacco products - even going as far as prohibiting "walk-in humidors" in cigar stores.

That is very much absolute non-sense.

I am against those measures.

You can voice your discontent - do it, now  - don't complain later !!

Stand up for your rights - Time to stop these jokers.
 

Here's the EU website and a pdf form that explains the proposed changes :


ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/consultations/tobacco_cons_01_en.htm


ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/docs/tobacco_consultation_en.pdf



Nino

ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ipm/forms/dispatch?form=tobacco6

Public consultation on the possible revision of the Tobacco Products Directive 2001/37/EC

Here is my submission :


Meta Informations


Creation date


20-11-2010 




Affiliation

citizen


Name

Nino Munoz 




E-mail Adress




Country

Germany 




Age

57 



Gender

male



Questions on the Scope of the Directive


Do you agree with the problem definition?

No




If not, please provide explanations


 There is no problem as it is, you make it a problem ! 



In your view, which option addresses the problem most effectively?

No change



Do you recommend any additional option that would effectively address the problem?


Yes, leave cigar smokers alone, we are adult people. 



Do you have any additional specific comments?

See above 




Questions on smokeless tobacco products


Is the problem definition correct?

No




If not, please provide your comments and supporting evidence.


see my earlier comments 



In your view, which option addresses the problem most effectively?

No change



Do you recommend any additional option that would effectively address the problem?


see my earlier comments 



Do you have any additional specific comments?


see my earlier comments 




Questions on the consumer information


Do you agree with the problem definition?

No




If not, please provide explanations


see my earlier comments 



In your view, which option addresses the problem most effectively? (more than one option can be chosen unless you choose "No change")

No change



Do you recommend any additional option that would effectively address the problem?


see my earlier comments 



Do you have any additional specific comments?


see my earlier comments 




Questions on reporting and registration of ingredients


Do you agree with the problem definition?

No




If not, please provide explanations


see my earlier comments 



In your view, which option addresses the problem most effectively? (more than one option can be chosen unless you choose "No change")

No change



Do you recommend any additional option that would effectively address the problem?



see my earlier comments 



Do you have any additional specific comments?


see my earlier comments 




Questions on the regulation of ingredients


Do you agree with the problem definition?

No




If not, please provide explanations


see my earlier comments 



In your view, which option addresses the problem most effectively?

No Change



Do you recommend any additional option that would effectively address the problem?


see my earlier comments 



Do you have any additional specific comments?


see my earlier comments 




Questions on access to tobacco products


Do you agree with the problem definition?

No




If not, please provide explanations

see my earlier comments 



In your view, which option addresses the problem most effectively? (more than one option can be chosen unless you choose "No change")

No change



Do you recommend any additional option that would effectively address the problem?


see my earlier comments 



Do you have any additional specific comments?


Why is this form only in English - bad joke ?? That is VERY discriminatory - don't my taxes pay for enough translators yet ??  





Copyright Nino



 
Besucherstatistik:
Gesamt: 467214